Shared from the 12/8/2018 Idaho Statesman eEdition

Feds to ease drilling controls that protect sage grouse

Picture
JERRET RAFFETY Rawlins Daily Times

Male sage grouses fight for the attention of females southwest of Rawlins, Wyo. The Trump administration moved forward Thursday with plans to ease restrictions on oil and natural gas drilling and other activities across millions of acres in the American West that were put in place to protect the imperiled bird species.

BILLINGS, MONT.

The Trump administration moved forward Thursday with plans to ease restrictions on oil and natural gas drilling, mining and other activities across millions of acres in the American West that were put in place to protect the imperiled greater sage grouse.

Land management documents released by the U.S. Interior Department show the administration intends to open more public lands to leasing and allow waivers for drilling to encroach into the habitat of the bird.

Critics warned that the changes could wipe out grouse colonies as drilling disrupts breeding grounds. Federal officials under President Barack Obama in 2015 had adopted a sweeping set of land-use restrictions intended to stop the birds’ decline.

Interior Deputy Secretary David Bernhardt said the agency was responding to requests by states to give them more flexibility in how public lands are managed. He said the goal to conserve sage grouse was unchanged.

“I completely believe that these plans are leaning forward on the conservation of sage grouse,” Bernhardt said. “Do they do it in exactly the same way? No.”

The changes drew a sharp backlash from conservation groups and wildlife advocates, who warned excessive use of drilling waivers could push sage grouse onto the list of threatened and endangered species, and who said they continue to fight an administration that is doing environmental harm and putting the interests of industry above all else.

“If you allow exception after exception, that might make sense for a particular project in a particular spot, but you add them all together and you have death by a thousand cuts,” said National Wildlife Association Vice President Tracy Stone-Manning.

Sage grouse range across about 270,000 square miles in parts of 11 Western U.S. states, including Idaho, and two Canadian provinces. Their numbers have plummeted in recent decades.

The Trump administration’s proposal would reverse or modify the Obama-era protections in seven states: Idaho, Wyoming, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, California and Oregon. No significant changes were proposed in Montana, Washington or the Dakotas.

In 2015, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service pledged to revisit the bird’s status in five years, after determining the Obama administration’s plans were sufficient to keep the bird off the threatened or endangered lists.

The agency revealed Thursday that it no longer plans that 2020 status review, which can be a first step toward determining whether greater protections are needed.

Spokeswoman Jennifer Strickland said that the Fish and Wildlife Service is not legally required to complete a review. Instead, it will work with the Western Association of State Wildlife Agencies to document the effectiveness of the conservation plans.

Under President Donald Trump, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke has vowed to lift obstacles to drilling, and grouse protections have long been viewed by the energy industry as an obstacle to development.

The new plans remove the most protective habitat designations for about 13,000 square miles of public land. Those areas, considered essential to the species’ survival, were a centerpiece of the Obama policy. The Trump administration also wants to drop some requirements to prioritize leasing for oil and gas outside sage grouse habitat.

Sage grouse are large, ground-dwelling birds known for an elaborate mating ritual in which males strut around breeding grounds with large, puffed-out air sacs protruding from their chests.

They once numbered in the millions. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service now estimates the population at 200,000 to 500,000. Energy development, disease and other causes have decimated populations in some areas.

See this article in the e-Edition Here