Shared from the 7/3/2017 Houston Chronicle eEdition


Union dues

Lawmakers should reject plan to limit teacher payroll process.

Teachers don’t get many breaks that make their lives slightly easier. So why is Gov. Greg Abbot trying to eliminate one that costs the taxpayer nothing? Politics — not reform — is the answer.

For the past few decades, there’s been a convenient way for teachers to handle association and union dues, for those who choose to join. Along with a host of other deductions, teachers who so desire can allow their respective school districts to just deduct the fee from their paychecks.

For the upcoming special legislative session Abbott, Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, and Rep. Jason Isaac, R-Dripping Springs, want to take away the ability of public employees — with teachers comprising the largest group — to use payroll deductions for their union, labor organization and/or professional association dues. Their fellow lawmakers should refuse to support this effort.

Payroll deductions are routine and common, and competent payroll systems can easily handle deductions for union or professional association dues. The organizations receiving the dues are responsible for the administrative costs with no cost to the taxpayer, according to a fiscal note attached to a similar bill filed by state Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, that died during the regular session.

While it’s a simple matter for school districts to issue deductions on a payroll process that they’re already paying for, the law will force unions and other professional associations to create a whole new billing and collections infrastructure for their members. This will be costly, and unions will likely lose significant membership, at least initially.

Texas is a right-to-work state, and teachers don’t have to join unions or professional associations. But for those who do, the Texas American Federation of Teachers, the Association of Texas Professional Educators and similar groups play an important role in giving teachers a voice in a state that often seems reluctant to listen to them.

Although the bill to be drafted by Hughes and Isaac hasn’t been filed, it’s expected that it will be cut from the same cloth as the Huffman bill and will exempt police officers and firefighters unions from its terms. “It’s really telling that the Legislature is willing to put tape over the mouths of teachers, who are more likely female, while exempting male-dominated professions,” says Zeph Capo, president of the Houston Federation of Teachers.

Educator groups often don’t always see eye-to eye with the Republican-controlled Legislature on issues like school funding and vouchers. As such, this feels like a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist — unless in lawmakers’ eyes, the problem is teachers having a strong voice.

See this article in the e-Edition Here
Edit Privacy